|
No Comments |
|
|
Staff: |
Michael Verne |
|
Response / Comments: |
03/14/2012 |
|
|
|
From: |
(Redacted) |
|
Sent: |
Wednesday, March 14, 2012 3:20 PM |
|
To: |
Verne, B. Michael |
|
Subject: |
PRIOR REQUEST |
MIKE, the spinoff of Company B in my prior email was not pro rata; I do not think this matters as the spun off divisions were part of Company A at the time of the original filing and as noted, the same antitrust review occurred; opinion 242 (example 3) does not require pro rata spin off, only that the spun off Company was, in effect, part of the original filing acquiring person, thanks Victor
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments is intended only for the recipient[s] listed above and may be privileged and confidential. Any dissemination, copying, or use of or reliance upon such information by or to anyone other than the recipient[s] listed above is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately at the email address above and destroy any and all copies of this message.